If you would like more information on the results or would like to know more about the project, please
feel free to email firstname.lastname@example.org
Azfar, A., Choo, K. and Liu, L. (2016). An Android Communication App Forensic Taxonomy. Journal of
Forensic Sciences, 61(5), pp.1337-1350.
Barmpatsalou, K., Damopoulos, D., Kambourakis, G. and Katos, V. (2013). A critical review of 7 years
of Mobile Device Forensics. Digital Investigation, 10(4), pp.323-349.
Byard, R., James, H., Berketa, J. and Heath, K. (2015). Locard's Principle of Exchange, Dental
Examination and Fragments of Skin. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 61(2), pp.545-547.
Casey, E. (2010). Handbook of digital forensics and investigation. Amsterdam: Academic.
Dezfoli, F., Dehghantanha, A., Mahmoud, R., Sani, N. and Daryabar, F. (2013). Digital forensic trends
and future. International Journal of Cyber-Security and Digital Forensics, 2(2), p.48.
Garfinkel, S. (2010). Digital forensics research: The next 10 years. Digital Investigation, 7,
Gibbs, S. (2014). Court sets legal precedent with evidence from Fitbit health tracker. online the
Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/nov/18/court-accepts-data
-fitbit-health-tracker Accessed 26 Oct. 2017.
Lartey, J. (2017). Man suspected in wife's murder after her Fitbit data doesn't match his alibi.
online the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/25/fitbit-data-
murder-suspect-richard-dabate Accessed 11 Oct. 2017.
Peppet, SR 2014, 'Regulating the Internet of Things: First Steps Toward Managing Discrimination,
Privacy, Security, and Consent', Texas Law Review, 93, 1, pp. 85-178, Business Source Complete,
EBSCOhost, viewed 25 September 2017.
Wei, J. (2014). How Wearables Intersect with the Cloud and the Internet of Things : Considerations
for the developers of wearables. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine. 3 (3). pp. 53-56. Available
from: Accessed: 20 September 2017.
First published in
CSEye February 2018